Mild versus conventional ovarian stimulation for IVF in poor, normal and hyper-responders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Research & Innovation
Written By Michael Pearce

Background: Mild ovarian stimulation has emerged as an alternative to conventional IVF with the advantages of being more patient-friendly and less expensive. Inadequate data on pregnancy outcomes and concerns about the cycle cancellation rate (CCR) have prevented mild, or low-dose, IVF from gaining wide acceptance.

Michael Pearce
Sign up to read this post
Join Now
Previous

The case for mild stimulation for IVF: recommendations from The International Society for Mild Approaches in Assisted Reproduction
Next

Mild ovarian stimulation for IVF: 10 years later